1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (180 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 279 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 98 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1811 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 71 L |
