1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 293 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6350 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1797 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3052 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |
