1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 740 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | E-Series |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1511 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 150 L |