1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 512 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Expedition |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2652 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 106 L |