1963 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (583 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (142 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Biarritz | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Biarritz | 220 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 142 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 72.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 48 L |