1963 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 1980 Volvo 164 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (583 Nm) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 164. (204 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Biarritz | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Biarritz | 164 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 204 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3350 mm |