1963 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1981 Volvo 240

To start off, 1981 Volvo 240 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (111 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 880 kg more than 1981 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (583 Nm) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (185 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.

Compare all specifications: