1963 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1999 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Biarritz.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (583 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Biarritz | 1999 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Biarritz | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2610 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2350 mm |
