1963 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2002 Toyota FXS
To start off, 2002 Toyota FXS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 880 kg more than 2002 Toyota FXS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (583 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota FXS. (270 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota FXS.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Biarritz | 2002 Toyota FXS | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Biarritz | FXS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |