1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1975 Volvo 66 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1975 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac DeVille | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | 66 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
