1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 1981 Renault 18 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1981 Renault 18. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (582 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (181 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 1981 Renault 18 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | DeVille | 18 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |