1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1990 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1990 Maserati Shamal is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Maserati Shamal (321 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 822 kg more than 1990 Maserati Shamal.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac DeVille | 1990 Maserati Shamal | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | DeVille | Shamal |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3217 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 321 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1950 mm |
