1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1998 Mazda 626
To start off, 1998 Mazda 626 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 626. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 937 kg more than 1998 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 1998 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 626 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1700 mm |