1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado (290 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 384 kg more than 2000 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | DeVille | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 290 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1758 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1920 mm |
