1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (582 Nm) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | DeVille | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |