1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Hyundai Equus
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Equus is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2002 Hyundai Equus. (194 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Hyundai Equus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 152 kg more than 2002 Hyundai Equus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Hyundai Equus | |
Make | Cadillac | Hyundai |
Model | DeVille | Equus |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 194 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1880 mm |