1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (198 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Panda. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (582 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Panda. (145 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | DeVille | Panda |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1251 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1630 mm |