1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 657 kg more than 2004 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 MG ZT | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | DeVille | ZT |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1790 mm |