1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2006 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2006 Subaru Outback is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Subaru Outback (250 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 509 kg more than 2006 Subaru Outback.
Because 2006 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2006 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | DeVille | Outback |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 250 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1633 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1780 mm |
