1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S40. (134 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S40.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | S40 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1720 mm |