1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2009 Kia Carnival is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Kia Carnival. (142 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Carnival. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Carnival weights approximately 78 kg more than 1963 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Kia Carnival | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | DeVille | Carnival |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2902 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1910 mm |