1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (266 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | DeVille | Highlander |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1920 mm |