1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Acura ZDX
To start off, 2010 Acura ZDX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura ZDX (300 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura ZDX should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 142 kg more than 2010 Acura ZDX.
Because 2010 Acura ZDX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura ZDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Acura ZDX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | DeVille | ZDX |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4887 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1994 mm |
