1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 795 kg more than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
| Model | DeVille | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 103 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1760 mm |
