1963 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (582 Nm) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Cadillac | Smart |
Model | DeVille | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1867 mm |