1963 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Eldorado | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Eldorado | Colt |
Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2310 mm |