1963 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1984 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1984 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Eldorado | 1984 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | Eldorado | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1116 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2460 mm |
