1963 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz C is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Eldorado | 2004 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Eldorado | C |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 62 L |