1963 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Fleetwood | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2840 mm |
