1963 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2006 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Fleetwood | 2006 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
Model | Fleetwood | Rodius |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2694 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3010 mm |