1963 Cadillac Park Avenue vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Park Avenue | Condor |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2438 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
