1963 Cadillac Park Avenue vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue | 2005 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Park Avenue | R |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3220 mm |
