1963 Cadillac Park Avenue vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Park Avenue | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | Park Avenue | Polo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2470 mm |
