1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1982 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1982 Fiat Argenta is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Sixty | 1982 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | Sixty | Argenta |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 35 L |
