1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 580 kg more than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280. (260 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sixty | 280 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |