1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1996 Honda Integra. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 926 kg more than 1996 Honda Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Sixty | 1996 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | Sixty | Integra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4525 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1325 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
