1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1996 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Golf. (172 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Golf.
Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volkswagen Golf. (235 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 1996 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | Sixty | Golf |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 235 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |