1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1997 Proton Tiara

To start off, 1997 Proton Tiara is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1997 Proton Tiara. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1997 Proton Tiara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1997 Proton Tiara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Proton Tiara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 492 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Proton Tiara. (90 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Proton Tiara.

Compare all specifications: