1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2000 GAZ 3111

To start off, 2000 GAZ 3111 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 GAZ 3111. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2000 GAZ 3111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 625 kg more than 2000 GAZ 3111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GAZ 3111. (216 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GAZ 3111.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Cadillac Sixty 2000 GAZ 3111
Make Cadillac GAZ
Model Sixty 3111
Year Released 1963 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 2287 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 216 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2125 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 5670 mm 4950 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2810 mm