1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2000 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Honda Integra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 926 kg more than 2000 Honda Integra.
Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2000 Honda Integra | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | Sixty | Integra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |