1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 285 kg more than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3010 mm |