1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Sixty | Cheyenne |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1950 mm |