1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Chevrolet Corvette

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Corvette (405 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 675 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Corvette.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Corvette. (542 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Corvette.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Cadillac Sixty 2004 Chevrolet Corvette
Make Cadillac Chevrolet
Model Sixty Corvette
Year Released 1963 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 5968 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 405 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 542 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2125 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 5670 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1220 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 68 L