1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 Jaguar S-Type

To start off, 2005 Jaguar S-Type is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 505 kg more than 2005 Jaguar S-Type.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jaguar S-Type. (245 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jaguar S-Type.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Cadillac Sixty 2005 Jaguar S-Type
Make Cadillac Jaguar
Model Sixty S-Type
Year Released 1963 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 245 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 81.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 79.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2125 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 5670 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 70 L