1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 595 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | Sixty | K2700 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |