1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2005 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Korando is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Korando. (148 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 283 kg more than 2005 SsangYong Korando. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Korando. (213 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Korando.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2005 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
Model | Sixty | Korando |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 88.4 mm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1842 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |