1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Lancia Thesis
To start off, 2006 Lancia Thesis is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Lancia Thesis. (185 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2006 Lancia Thesis.
Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lancia Thesis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lancia Thesis. (447 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lancia Thesis.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Lancia Thesis | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | Sixty | Thesis |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2397 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 447 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
