1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CL (604 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 407 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 430 kg more than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CL.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CL (1,001 Nm) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (582 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Cadillac Sixty.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sixty | CL |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5982 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 1001 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 88 L |