1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo

To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Kangoo.

Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (114 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Kangoo.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Cadillac Sixty 2006 Renault Kangoo
Make Cadillac Renault
Model Sixty Kangoo
Year Released 1963 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 114 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 70 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5670 mm 4000 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 52 L