1963 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2011 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda CR-V.
Because 1963 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda CR-V. (350 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac Sixty | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | Sixty | CR-V |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 58 L |